White Sox Offseason Plan Raises Questions About Left Field and Benintendi

White Sox offseason decisions

Left field and Andrew Benintendi stand out as open questions in Josh Nelson’s upcoming Offseason Plan Project on Sox Machine. Nelson lists seven players who aren’t expected back, including four grouped as backup catchers or injured relievers whose production fell short. In a discussion with Jim Margalus, he considers how the White Sox might handle left field in 2027 and whether Benintendi could be waived if he struggles early in the season.

Those questions sit at different levels of the roster. The seven departures Nelson identifies are a way to think through the edges of the club: players whose roles, health, or output may not justify another place on the roster. Left field is a more visible puzzle because it concerns a regular position, while Benintendi’s possible departure would turn a performance question into a decision about how the team wants to use a roster spot.

The distinction matters. A team can replace a reserve role internally or look for a different kind of depth, but a regular spot calls for a clearer plan. The available discussion doesn’t settle what the White Sox will do. It frames the choices they’ll have to weigh.

Why left field remains an open question

Left field isn’t just a name on a lineup card. A club choosing how to fill it has to consider the player’s expected role, the options elsewhere on the roster, and what those choices mean for the lineup as a whole. If a team has no established answer, it can spread playing time among several players, seek a regular through the offseason, or wait to see how the roster develops. Each route carries a tradeoff in certainty and flexibility.

That uncertainty can be more consequential than it first appears. A rotating arrangement may let the club evaluate players, but it can also leave the lineup without a settled role at a position. A dedicated acquisition could bring clarity, though it would reduce room for other players to make a case. The source identifies the question without prescribing a solution, and that’s appropriate: the answer depends on what other roster decisions the White Sox make.

Here’s the thing: an offseason plan is useful partly because it makes these dependencies visible. Left field can’t be evaluated in isolation from the players expected to return, the players Nelson considers unlikely to return, or the club’s willingness to give a player time to improve. The position is a practical roster problem, not simply a search for a name.

Benintendi and the waiver question

Nelson and Margalus also consider whether Benintendi could be waived if he struggles early in the season. That’s a conditional scenario, not a report that the White Sox have made such a decision. Its importance lies in the question it raises: how long should a team stick with a player whose early performance falls short, and what would it gain by using that roster place differently?

In baseball, a waiver decision can be one way a club changes its roster, but the decision is rarely just a verdict on a player’s most recent stretch. Teams generally have to weigh expected future contribution against the alternatives available to them, while also considering role and timing. A slow start may be a warning sign, a temporary slump, or too small a sample to tell. That uncertainty makes any firm prediction premature.

This is more significant than it looks. Benintendi’s status could affect how the White Sox approach left field, but the reverse is also true: a plan for the position could shape how much patience the club has with him. If you're working in this space, the useful question isn’t only whether he starts slowly. It’s what the team believes it can gain by changing course, and whether another option is ready to take on the role.

And this is the part most people overlook: asking whether a player might be waived doesn’t establish that the club has a viable replacement. A roster opening is an opportunity, but an opening by itself doesn’t improve the team. The quality and fit of the available alternatives matter.

What the seven expected departures suggest

Nelson’s list includes seven players who aren’t expected back, with four grouped as backup catchers or injured relievers whose production fell short. Those categories point to familiar roster questions. Backup catchers have a distinct job from everyday players, while relievers’ availability and results can vary; in either case, a team has to decide whether the role is worth another spot and whether another player can fill it.

That’s not enough information to judge each player or infer the club’s full plans. The source doesn’t provide their names, individual performance records, or the reasons behind every expected departure. What it does provide is a useful outline: the discussion includes both position depth and pitching availability, areas where clubs often have to balance immediate performance with the need to cover a season’s changing demands.

The numbers here are underwhelming as a forecast: seven names on a projected list don’t tell readers who will actually leave or who might arrive. Their value is as a starting point for discussion. An offseason plan can clarify which decisions appear likely, but its assumptions still need to be tested against the club’s eventual choices.

What to watch as the plan takes shape

The White Sox have two linked questions to answer: how they want to cover left field and how much early-season patience they’re prepared to give Benintendi. Nelson’s project and his conversation with Margalus put those issues alongside the expected departures, offering a framework for following the roster rather than a finished blueprint.

For readers, the useful signals will be the choices the club makes about roles and playing time. Does it treat left field as a position that needs a clear regular, or as a spot where several players can compete? If Benintendi struggles, does the team continue to give him opportunities, or does it judge that a roster change offers a better path? The source leaves those questions open, as it should.

There’s a broader lesson in the exercise: an offseason plan is most valuable when it shows where uncertainty sits. It can identify likely departures and expose the positions that lack a settled answer. It can’t remove the unknowns that come with performance, health, and the options a team has in hand. For now, left field and Benintendi are the questions to watch.

Still unresolved.

Presented by Ankin Law - Injury Law Made Personal

New Sox Machine gear

The post Podcast: 5 White Sox Not Coming Back appeared first on Sox Machine.